From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Flower <gavinflower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended |
Date: | 2011-07-29 14:45:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxozea9BzWR_Bcs=9mWYb5HrpXKrJFyo443e7JK7-b67ePw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Dave Page's message of vie jul 29 10:13:50 -0400 2011:
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
>> >> /postgres-9.1/share/doc/html/manage-ag-overview.html
>> >> In the folowing partagrasoh 'recommendable' should be 'recommended'.
>> >
>> > Seems perfectly ok as-is to me ...
>>
>> Sounds hideous to me. I ran it past one of our tech writers (Susan
>> Douglas), who rewrote the sentence as:
>>
>> If a single PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or users
>> that should be separate (for the most part unaware of each other), we
>> recommend storing them in separate databases.
>
> Except that we don't use the first person in docs, do we?
That's easily changed.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-07-29 14:50:25 | Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-07-29 14:41:47 | Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended |