From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Flower <gavinflower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended |
Date: | 2011-07-29 14:41:47 |
Message-ID: | 1311950209-sup-9538@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Excerpts from Dave Page's message of vie jul 29 10:13:50 -0400 2011:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
> >> /postgres-9.1/share/doc/html/manage-ag-overview.html
> >> In the folowing partagrasoh 'recommendable' should be 'recommended'.
> >
> > Seems perfectly ok as-is to me ...
>
> Sounds hideous to me. I ran it past one of our tech writers (Susan
> Douglas), who rewrote the sentence as:
>
> If a single PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or users
> that should be separate (for the most part unaware of each other), we
> recommend storing them in separate databases.
Except that we don't use the first person in docs, do we?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-07-29 14:45:01 | Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-07-29 14:13:50 | Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended |