Re: pldebugger license: Artistic 1.0 or 2.0?

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 6:46 AM Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
wrote:

> Being in the Perl community from where the Artistic licenses originate, I
> assume
> the original intent was version 1.0, which is why the statement is
> unqualified.
>

It was.

>
> That being said, I recommend that the copyright holder explicitly license
> it
> under the Artistic 2.0, which is a much better version of the license,
> having
> the same intent but being much more clear and legally solid.
>

And I have,.

Thanks!

>
> -- Darren Duncan
>
> On 2018-10-14 1:13 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Debian ftp masters pointed out that the pldebugger license is
> > ambiguous: The source code states this:
> >
> > Licence
> > -------
> >
> > The pl/pgsql debugger API is released under the Artistic Licence.
> >
> > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php
> >
> > Copyright (c) 2004-2017 EnterpriseDB Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
> >
> > ... but the link to opensource.org (now) points to a disambiguation
> > page to choose between version 1.0 and 2.0 of the license.
> >
> > Could you clarify which of the two you want there? (Or maybe a
> > combination like "1.0, or any later version".)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Christoph
> >
> >
>
>
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company