From: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgAdmin III support <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pldebugger license: Artistic 1.0 or 2.0? |
Date: | 2018-10-15 05:46:08 |
Message-ID: | 46696aba-4207-6da7-4367-e0684142b77c@darrenduncan.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
Being in the Perl community from where the Artistic licenses originate, I assume
the original intent was version 1.0, which is why the statement is unqualified.
That being said, I recommend that the copyright holder explicitly license it
under the Artistic 2.0, which is a much better version of the license, having
the same intent but being much more clear and legally solid.
-- Darren Duncan
On 2018-10-14 1:13 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Debian ftp masters pointed out that the pldebugger license is
> ambiguous: The source code states this:
>
> Licence
> -------
>
> The pl/pgsql debugger API is released under the Artistic Licence.
>
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php
>
> Copyright (c) 2004-2017 EnterpriseDB Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
>
> ... but the link to opensource.org (now) points to a disambiguation
> page to choose between version 1.0 and 2.0 of the license.
>
> Could you clarify which of the two you want there? (Or maybe a
> combination like "1.0, or any later version".)
>
> Thanks,
> Christoph
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | petr.fedorov | 2018-10-16 10:10:02 | Is CREATE AGGREGATE supported by pgAdmin4? |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2018-10-14 20:13:30 | pldebugger license: Artistic 1.0 or 2.0? |