Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Date: 2025-01-22 09:25:30
Message-ID: CA+OCxozUCheCGtr2nvKtABtGM+R_mn2F8mDOVRaL5bwBr26Bbg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 09:17, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:

> > On 10 Jul 2024, at 19:06, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> (Reviving an old thread to give them a chance to finish before v18)
>
> > For now maybe we can do the future proofing for gssapi & openssl includes
> > and do testing if openssl clashes with some other lib too.
>
> Where did this end up, is compilation on Windows with OpenSSL and GSSAPI
> still
> an issue? AFAICT the fixes from this thread are yet to be applied and it
> would
> be nice to have that done before v18 if still needed.
>

I kid you not, 20 seconds ago I hit send on a message on a pgAdmin thread
where I was complaining this bug was outstanding to someone asking about
GSSAPI support on Windows. That's quite the coincidence.

Anyway, no fix was committed as far as I know. I would suggest it should
be back-patched as well.

--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2025-01-22 09:48:59 Re: Proposal for Updating CRC32C with AVX-512 Algorithm.
Previous Message Benoit Lobréau 2025-01-22 09:24:33 Re: doc: explain pgstatindex fragmentation