Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Date: 2025-01-22 09:17:13
Message-ID: 17DAB8F5-DFDE-462E-A0FB-3F596C1B130B@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 10 Jul 2024, at 19:06, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

(Reviving an old thread to give them a chance to finish before v18)

> For now maybe we can do the future proofing for gssapi & openssl includes
> and do testing if openssl clashes with some other lib too.

Where did this end up, is compilation on Windows with OpenSSL and GSSAPI still
an issue? AFAICT the fixes from this thread are yet to be applied and it would
be nice to have that done before v18 if still needed.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benoit Lobréau 2025-01-22 09:24:33 Re: doc: explain pgstatindex fragmentation
Previous Message Oleg Tselebrovskiy 2025-01-22 09:03:39 Inconsistent string comparison using modified ICU collations