Re: meson "experimental"?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: meson "experimental"?
Date: 2024-06-05 09:30:54
Message-ID: CA+OCxozSdUQbMah4cbZyRu9_wYdGu3x-GH8uVWPJ0oe4_Y+skg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 17:36, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:

> On 04/06/2024 18:28, Dave Page wrote:
> > I clearly missed the discussion in which it was decided to remove the
> > old MSVC++ support from the tree (and am disappointed about that as I
> > would have objected loudly). Having recently started testing Meson on
> > Windows when I realised that change had been made, and having to update
> > builds for pgAdmin and the Windows installers, I think it's clear it's
> > far more experimental on that platform than it is on Linux at least.
>
> What kind of issues did you run into? Have they been fixed since?
>

zlib detection (
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+OCxozrPZx57ue8rmhq6CD1Jic5uqKh80=vTpZurSKESn-dkw@mail.gmail.com)
for which Nazir worked up an as-yet-uncommitted patch.

uuid detection, which Andrew fixed.

I also ran into an issue in which the build fails if both gssapi and
openssl are enabled, but it turns out that's a code issue that affects at
least v16 with the old build system as well.

--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-06-05 09:34:43 Re: Fix grammar oddities in comments
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2024-06-05 09:06:54 Re: Addressing SECURITY DEFINER Function Vulnerabilities in PostgreSQL Extensions