From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Are postgresql-9.4 binaries available on Windows XP? |
Date: | 2014-08-22 09:11:06 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxozOiosceStccDEX3Z4L_J8whvW1e5zX2QUMeR+Wv2n9Cg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hi Dave and Andrew,
>
> I recently noticed the thread
> [BUGS] BUG #11039: installation fails when trying to install C++
> redistributable .
>
> Unfortunately I have no XP machine at hand and can't test the
> installer by myself.
>
> Looking at the binaries in the package, they seem to be built using
> Visual Studio 2013. I'm suspicious if the binaries are available on
> Windows XP.
>
> If I recognize correctly, Visual Studio 2012 or later doesn't support
> Windows XP by default and Platform Toolset v120_xp (or v110_xp) must
> be specified so as to build binaries guaranteed to be avaiable on
> Windows XP. However MSBuildProject.pm seems to specify v120 (or v110) as
> the PlarformToolset property. Is it intentional?
I can't say whether that was an intentional change or not as I wasn't
involved in writing that patch, but I can say that EDB will not be
supporting Windows XP for our future builds now that it's been
(finally) made obsolete by Microsoft when extended support ended in
April.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2014-08-22 09:38:23 | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |
Previous Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2014-08-22 08:52:12 | Re: pg_upgrade: allow multiple -o/-O options |