Re: inherit support for foreign tables

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inherit support for foreign tables
Date: 2014-08-22 09:38:23
Message-ID: 53F70F8F.5030406@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2014/08/22 12:58), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Noah Misch wrote:
>
>> I'm anticipating a bug report along these lines:
>>
>> I saw poor estimates involving a child foreign table, so I ran "ANALYZE
>> VERBOSE", which reported 'INFO: analyzing "public.parent" inheritance
>> tree'. Estimates remained poor, so I scratched my head for awhile before
>> noticing that pg_stats didn't report such statistics. I then ran "ANALYZE
>> VERBOSE parent", saw the same 'INFO: analyzing "public.parent" inheritance
>> tree', but this time saw relevant rows in pg_stats. The message doesn't
>> reflect the actual behavior.
>>
>> I'll sympathize with that complaint.
>
> Agreed on that.

I've got the point. Will fix.

Thanks for the comment!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajeev rastogi 2014-08-22 10:14:36 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers
Previous Message Dave Page 2014-08-22 09:11:06 Re: Are postgresql-9.4 binaries available on Windows XP?