Re: Greenplum warning message

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Per Wigren <per(dot)wigren(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> No, they have just started the process of merging upstream, starting with
> the same version they forked from, then merging forward a few commits at at
> time. That is a huge undertaking so I suspect that it will take quite a
> while before there is a stable release based on modern PostgreSQL.
>
> I would very much like to have the warning dialog removed before the next
> pgAdmin3 release. Everything I have tried works as good as with PostgreSQL
> 9.4:
> * Connecting
> * Running queries
> * Viewing Greenplum specific explain plans
> * Table definitions show Greenplum specific syntax like DISTRIBUTED BY
> * Editing functions, views and rules work
> * Other Greenplum specific things like viewing Resource Queues and External
> Tables (similar to foreign tables) work properly
> * Table properties/statistics/dependencies/dependents work
> * Creating/dropping/modifying users/roles work
> * Server status works
>
> // Per

Are you able to test the attached patch?

> tis 1 dec. 2015 kl 13:09 skrev Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Per Wigren <per(dot)wigren(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > 2015-11-27 10:02 GMT+01:00 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What version does GP report itself as if you do "SELECT version()"?
>> >>
>> >
>> > PostgreSQL 8.2.15 (Greenplum Database 4.3.6.1 build 2) on
>> > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.4.2 compiled on
>> > Oct 1
>> > 2015 15:14:22
>> >
>> > It was originally forked from PostgreSQL 8.2.15 but they have backported
>> > and/or developed many of the features of newer versions in parallel (no
>> > pun
>> > intended), including protocol and system table changes used by modern
>> > drivers and client tools like pgAdmin.
>>
>> I thought the code they were releasing was supposed to be based on a
>> newer version?
>>
>> In any case, in principal I don't object to fixing the message to not
>> be shown on GP, however we really need someone to test it properly
>> first to be sure that there are no problems. At one point that was
>> done by Greenplum, but not at present (as far as I know).
>> Unfortunately that's not something I or my team at EDB can do.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company