From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Ivan E(dot) Panchenko" <i(dot)panchenko(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Obartunov <Obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres Pro build for windows |
Date: | 2017-11-23 12:15:20 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxoyATnkQk_GK9_SKgx=dqMnQUkTzneoBh+-A0R7gQv77Fw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Hi
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Ivan E. Panchenko <
i(dot)panchenko(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> Sorry for slow reply. Our patch for windows GUI installers page is
> attached.
>
From looking at the Github page, it looks like you are applying a number of
patches to PostgreSQL. Is that correct?
The reason I ask is that when EDB first started publishing the installers
for postgresql.org, the agreement with the core team members present at the
meeting was that we would be publishing pure, unmodified PostgreSQL.
EDB never deviated from that policy (despite occasionally wanting to), and
I don't think the community should change it now - if a
fix/feature/whatever isn't in the PostgreSQL tarball, then it shouldn't be
in what are advertised as endorsed "official" builds offered for download.
For clarity, opinions are my own, and not necessarily those of EDB.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivan E. Panchenko | 2017-11-23 14:13:41 | Re: Postgres Pro build for windows |
Previous Message | Ivan E. Panchenko | 2017-11-23 12:03:28 | Re: Postgres Pro build for windows |