From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | fred(dot)escallier(at)free(dot)fr |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Translators: web platform for translations? |
Date: | 2022-01-31 09:59:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxoy6OkX=_t4aSU9q_Lx-Hc1WY5j2ny5w0pK=ZaDwO7_fRw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 06:36, <fred(dot)escallier(at)free(dot)fr> wrote:
> Hello Dave
> I think it could be an useful solution, perhaps more reactive
> and I think that some users do not contribute because they are note
> comfortable with tools like poedit
> so, a good solution in my opinion, especially if it does not interfere
> with the current worklfow
>
Thanks for the feedback. That's roughly in line with my thinking.
> PS : I am also interested as I will have less time available. I am
> starting a new life as a farmer :-)
>
Wow, that sounds like a challenge. Good luck!
>
>
> 21 janvier 2022 14:33 "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org
> <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org?to=%22Dave%20Page%22%20%3Cdpage@pgadmin.org%3E>> a
> écrit:
>
> Translators,
> A ticket was logged in the issue tracker suggesting we use a translation
> management application such as Weblate (https://weblate.org/en-gb/) to
> allow online translation.
> Would you find this useful? Is it worth spending time standing up an
> instance for the project?
> FYI, I don't think it would need to affect the current workflow, for users
> that prefer their existing tooling.
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
>
>
--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Akshay Joshi | 2022-01-31 14:54:40 | pgAdmin 4 commit: Correct documentation for 'Add named restore point'. |
Previous Message | Yogesh Mahajan | 2022-01-31 09:12:06 | [pgAdmin][Patch] - Bug #7086 - wal_level settings reflect pre-postgresql version 9.6 values in restore point documentation |