Re: Issue tracking

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 11:31 PM Philippe Cloutier <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Le 2021-11-10 à 04:06, Dave Page a écrit :
>
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:23 PM Philippe Cloutier <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>
>> The ticket I filed was set to Status "Rejected". Could someone either
>> explain why or set that field to a more representative value?
>>
> Because at the time we had no plan to change tracker. Or are you talking
> about a different ticket?
>
>
> No, I am talking about #5042. I would obviously prefer if it had been
> solved yesterday, but it does not mention any timeframe. It is simply a
> report of the issue (and implicitly, a request to solve it as soon as
> possible).
>
Right, so it is the same ticket. We don't have any definitive plans to
change the tracker at the moment. As I mentioned, we are considering
Github, but that is by no means decided, and we may well leave things as
they are. It's also not a pgAdmin feature, which is another reason why the
issue was rejected; the issue tracker is for tracking features/bugs in
pgAdmin itself; we don't keep any infrastructure related issues there.

>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:20 AM Philippe Cloutier <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> After starting to use pgAdmin a couple years ago and struggling to track
>>> one of its issues, I figured out that its issue tracker was not publicly
>>> visible (an account is required to display tickets). I reported that
>>> meta-issue in report #5042.
>>>
>>> The ticket's Status field was later set to Rejected. In August, I asked
>>> in that ticket if there was a reason for that.
>>>
>>> In September, as there had been no answer, I specifically asked Dave
>>> Page, who is responsible for the field's change, if he could explain it.
>>> Unfortunately, more than a month later, that question remains unanswered,
>>> as can be seen in the following screenshot:
>>>
>>> I am therefore resorting to this forum to request help from the pgAdmin
>>> community. Can someone either solve that or at least help elucidate? A
>>> quick look indicates that Mr Page still contributes to pgAdmin.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> --
>>> Philippe Cloutierhttp://www.philippecloutier.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>> --
>> Philippe Cloutierhttp://www.philippecloutier.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> --
> Philippe Cloutierhttp://www.philippecloutier.com
>
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com