From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgadmin4][patch] Unit test fail on GreenPlum (#3190) |
Date: | 2018-03-10 20:53:13 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxowdoxCvcV6ag4Q85rD5HuG29jS08BH0M3V5Uac4EfN7pg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi
On Friday, March 9, 2018, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
>
> Attached you can find the patch that skip some tests and correct issues on
> SQL that are failing when trying to connect to a GreenPlum database.
>
> We did this by adding a attribute to to test_json called "db_type" that
> will carry the type of database we are running tests against.
>
Any reason we can't do that dynamically as we do with the EPAS-specific
tests?
>
> When we run tests against a GreenPlum instance the configuration would
> look like this:
>
> {
> "name": "GreenPlum",
> "comment": "GreenPlum DB",
> "db_username": "gp",
> "host": "localhost",
> "db_password": "",
> "db_port": 5433,
> "maintenance_db": "postgres",
> "sslmode": "prefer",
> "tablespace_path": "",
> "enabled": true,
> "db_type": "gpdb"
> }
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Joao
>
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joao De Almeida Pereira | 2018-03-11 23:22:05 | Re: [pgadmin4][patch] Unit test fail on GreenPlum (#3190) |
Previous Message | Murtuza Zabuawala | 2018-03-10 04:37:32 | Re: ACI Tree |