Re: [pgadmin4][patch] Unit test fail on GreenPlum (#3190)

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgadmin4][patch] Unit test fail on GreenPlum (#3190)
Date: 2018-03-10 20:53:13
Message-ID: CA+OCxowdoxCvcV6ag4Q85rD5HuG29jS08BH0M3V5Uac4EfN7pg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi

On Friday, March 9, 2018, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:

> Hello Hackers,
>
> Attached you can find the patch that skip some tests and correct issues on
> SQL that are failing when trying to connect to a GreenPlum database.
>
> We did this by adding a attribute to to test_json called "db_type" that
> will carry the type of database we are running tests against.
>

Any reason we can't do that dynamically as we do with the EPAS-specific
tests?

>
> When we run tests against a GreenPlum instance the configuration would
> look like this:
>
> {
> "name": "GreenPlum",
> "comment": "GreenPlum DB",
> "db_username": "gp",
> "host": "localhost",
> "db_password": "",
> "db_port": 5433,
> "maintenance_db": "postgres",
> "sslmode": "prefer",
> "tablespace_path": "",
> "enabled": true,
> "db_type": "gpdb"
> }
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Joao
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joao De Almeida Pereira 2018-03-11 23:22:05 Re: [pgadmin4][patch] Unit test fail on GreenPlum (#3190)
Previous Message Murtuza Zabuawala 2018-03-10 04:37:32 Re: ACI Tree