Re: Code of Conduct plan

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: James Keener <jim(at)jimkeener(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Eckhardt <reckhardt(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan
Date: 2018-09-14 14:17:51
Message-ID: CA+OCxowU9tJnKk=8FpRYgnO93WZtvXH1WjL_bfR59qi4Hj0G3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:10 PM, James Keener <jim(at)jimkeener(dot)com> wrote:

> I understand the concern, however, if you look at how attacks happen
>
>> it is frequently through other sites. Specifically under/poorly
>> moderated sites. For specific examples, people who have issues with
>> people on Quora will frequently go after them on Facebook and Twitter.
>>
>> these aren't a solution looking for a problem. If we just want to look
>> at the clusterfuck that is happening in the reddis community right now
>> we can see conversations spilling onto twitter and into ad hominem
>> vitriol.
>>
>
> You haven't established that this is both 1) the PG mailing list's problem
> and that 2) this can't and won't be used to retaliate against those holding
> unpopular viewpoints but aren't specifically harassing anyone.
>
> Now, you may say that (2) would be rejected by the committee, but I would
> counter that it's still a stain on me and something that will forever
> appear
> along side my name in search results and that the amount of time and
> stress it'd take me to defend myself would make my voluntarily leaving
> the community, which would be seen as an admission of guilt, my only
> option.
>

If you had read the policy, you would know that wouldn't happen as reports
and details of reports are to be kept confidential.

>
> People are shitheads. People are assholes. We're not agreeing to join
> some organization and sign an ethics clause when signing up for the mailing
> list. The current moderators can already remove bad actors from the list.
> How they act outside of the list is non of this list's concern.
>

The lists are just one of many different ways people in this community
interact.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2018-09-14 14:19:02 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2018-09-14 14:16:58 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2018-09-14 14:19:02 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2018-09-14 14:16:58 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2018-09-14 14:19:02 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2018-09-14 14:16:58 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2018-09-14 14:19:02 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2018-09-14 14:16:58 Re: Code of Conduct plan