Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Date: 2011-09-16 15:13:38
Message-ID: CA+OCxowHioEBFYtQQQeQMP64L55AgoAkNPaom5Dx6RRYjJE+fA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Susanne Ebrecht
<susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 16.09.2011 15:59, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> other plans less than 2 years ago. For me, a representative would have
>> been reporting back to us after each meeting, and discussing points to
>> raise before each meeting - not working in isolation, without the
>> knowledge of others.
>
> Dave,
>
> I exactly did this with Peter.
> Afair, I once was told it is enough to report to Peter.
> And as I said - David showed interests and we sometimes talk about it too.
> I never wanted to bother hackers with all this stuff.

-hackers is exactly where we would discuss issues related to
development and design of PostgreSQL.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Wilcox 2011-09-16 15:36:20 Re: Improve lseek scalability v3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-09-16 14:57:53 /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels