Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

From: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Date: 2011-09-16 14:49:25
Message-ID: 4E7361F5.30408@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16.09.2011 15:59, Dave Page wrote:
> other plans less than 2 years ago. For me, a representative would have
> been reporting back to us after each meeting, and discussing points to
> raise before each meeting - not working in isolation, without the
> knowledge of others.

Dave,

I exactly did this with Peter.
Afair, I once was told it is enough to report to Peter.
And as I said - David showed interests and we sometimes talk about it too.
I never wanted to bother hackers with all this stuff.

Susanne

--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-09-16 14:57:53 /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels
Previous Message Susanne Ebrecht 2011-09-16 14:10:13 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?