Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] A few PG buildfarm members need to be restarted(?)

Yeah, 1.6.3. This is an old box don't forget - I'm kinda surprised
that git is there at all. I've built the latest version anyway, and am
re-running....

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> That must be a very old git, dating from before Sept 2009
> (<http://osdir.com/ml/git/2009-09/msg00290.html>), which is before Postgres
> even started using git.
>
> I switched to porcelain format precisely because it is guaranteed not to
> change, and I got sick of constant breakage when they changed status
> messages every release.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
> On 05/18/2015 07:28 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> <sigh>. So now apparently the version of git on this box is too old,
>> as it doesn't support --porcelain. Attempting to build a new one.
>>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Argh - sent too soon...
>>>
>>> I'm still getting:
>>>
>>> Can't locate LWP.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
>>> /usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/sun4-solaris-64int /usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib
>>> /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/sun4-solaris-64int
>>> /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4 /usr/perl5/site_perl
>>> /usr/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/sun4-solaris-64int
>>> /usr/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4 /usr/perl5/vendor_perl .) at
>>> PGBuild/WebTxn.pm line 29.
>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at PGBuild/WebTxn.pm line 35.
>>> Compilation failed in require at ./run_build.pl line 77.
>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./run_build.pl line 77.
>>>
>>> Upon looking further, it seems that my previous versions of
>>> run_web_txn.pl all start with:
>>>
>>> #!/opt/csw/bin/perl
>>>
>>> Which makes sense, as that seems to be the default Perl on here.
>>> Clearly I must have changed that script years ago to ensure this
>>> worked (that Perl installation does have LWP installed).
>>>
>>> Anyway, I've updated the script again - firing off a build now.
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, well apparently installing LWP using cpan as root didn't help
>>>> anyway - I'm still getting:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That's very odd.
>>>>>
>>>>> LWP has been a requirement from Day 1 of the buildfarm. It's what's
>>>>> used to
>>>>> load the results to the server. There have been special considerations
>>>>> for
>>>>> older Msys systems, so that you run the main script with Msys perl,
>>>>> which
>>>>> used not to have LWP, and the web script with ActivePerl, which does,
>>>>> but
>>>>> that shouldn't apply on Solaris.
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> andrew
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/18/2015 04:57 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Casteroides and protosciurus appear to be stuck as the most recent
>>>>>> update to the BF code now seems to want the LWP perl module, which
>>>>>> wasn't installed. I've added that - will see if they recover.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following buildfarm members haven't reported on HEAD in more than
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> week:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tick
>>>>>>> leech
>>>>>>> markhor
>>>>>>> stilt
>>>>>>> protosciurus
>>>>>>> castoroides
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Several of these are using CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, and are probably
>>>>>>> stuck
>>>>>>> because of the plpython bug Peter E. introduced awhile back. That is
>>>>>>> believed to be fixed now, but you'll probably have to manually kill
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> current run to get it unstuck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards, tom lane
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pgbuildfarm-members mailing list
>>>>>>> Pgbuildfarm-members(at)lists(dot)pgfoundry(dot)org
>>>>>>> http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgbuildfarm-members
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave Page
>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>
>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>>
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company