Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Date: 2022-07-20 14:09:07
Message-ID: CA+HiwqGu5BcJw09c+2FQORZFqXKjdQXyKz+Ppb3wcUa5sU=1Hw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:37 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2022-07-19 20:40:11 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > About that, I was wondering if the blocks in llvm_compile_expr() need
> > to be hand-coded to match what's added in ExecInterpExpr() or if I've
> > missed some tool that can be used instead?
>
> The easiest way is to just call an external function for the implementation of
> the step. But yes, otherwise you need to handcraft it.

Ok, thanks.

So I started updating llvm_compile_expr() for handling the new
ExprEvalSteps that the patch adds to ExecExprInterp(), but quickly
realized that code could have been consolidated into less code, or
IOW, into fewer new ExprEvalSteps. So, I refactored things that way
and am now retrying adding the code to llvm_compile_expr() based on
new, better consolidated, code.

Here's the updated version, without the llvm pieces, in case you'd
like to look at it even in this state. I'll post a version with llvm
pieces filled in tomorrow. (I have merged the different patches into
one for convenience.)

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Some-improvements-to-JsonExpr-evaluation.patch application/octet-stream 45.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-07-20 14:12:43 Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-07-20 14:09:01 Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi