| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove unnecessary word in a comment |
| Date: | 2024-10-23 09:07:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqFbHp53hnsca3nePQO1HJCwk2139EZx1nOqCFzhp76G5Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 5:29 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think we should apply the attached which does this:
>
> --- a/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
> +++ b/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ ExecInitRangeTable(EState *estate, List
> *rangeTable, List *permInfos)
> * ExecGetRangeTableRelation
> * Open the Relation for a range table entry, if not already done
> *
> - * The Relations will be closed again in ExecEndPlan().
> + * The Relations will be closed in ExecEndPlan().
> */
> Relation
> ExecGetRangeTableRelation(EState *estate, Index rti)
Pushed in all branches.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Borisov | 2024-10-23 09:18:03 | Refine comments on usage WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH vs WL_EXIT_ON_PM_DEATH |
| Previous Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2024-10-23 08:51:02 | Re: allowing extensions to control planner behavior |