Re: partitioning code reorganization

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioning code reorganization
Date: 2018-04-15 02:57:41
Message-ID: CA+HiwqF8=Xhinhji9Ci=+=3Sr+yxJjbVaL2qrACjKV+=xU6HcQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Thanks! I pushed this now, putting back the enum in parsenodes and
> including this delta patch of yours.

Thank you. Do you think the following CF entry is good to be closed?

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-04-15 02:58:03 Re: partitioning code reorganization
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-04-15 02:52:55 Re: Guidelines on dropping objects in regression tests, sqlsmith