Re: partitioning code reorganization

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioning code reorganization
Date: 2018-04-15 00:17:06
Message-ID: 20180415001706.d4e2fwyt7hwk7kpx@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Thanks for taking care of few things I left like those PartitionKey
> > accessors in rel.h.
>
> Forgot to mention -- there are some files that still include
> catalog/partition.h but no longer need to. Find a delta patch
> attached that applies on your v6.

Thanks! I pushed this now, putting back the enum in parsenodes and
including this delta patch of yours.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-04-15 00:50:27 Guidelines on dropping objects in regression tests, sqlsmith
Previous Message Jordan Deitch 2018-04-14 23:24:36 Re: Proposal: Adding json logging