From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning |
Date: | 2022-03-31 11:11:54 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqEp6CssT00wiJxTVO_d6nrsmpsM8doOkOHmC5=vN3dHCg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 6:55 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> I'm looking at 0001 here with intention to commit later. I see that
> there is some resistance to 0004, but I think a final verdict on that
> one doesn't materially affect 0001.
Thanks.
While the main goal of the refactoring patch is to make it easier to
review the more complex changes that 0004 makes to execPartition.c, I
agree it has merit on its own. Although, one may say that the bit
about providing a PlanState-independent ExprContext is more closely
tied with 0004's requirements...
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-03-31 12:21:47 | Re: multithreaded zstd backup compression for client and server |
Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2022-03-31 11:09:06 | Re: Commitfest Update |