Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?

Hi

I think the straight package name "psycopg" would be good.

PS

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 15:46, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called
> "psycopg3". I guess many have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3
> transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each
> other. Sorry, Fibonacci...
>
> The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the
> coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I think
> the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi and the
> requirements.txt convention. Dark times...
>
> Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
> version number?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Daniele
>