From: | Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Slony replication |
Date: | 2007-12-10 15:45:40 |
Message-ID: | C6D37BBC-A0B4-49CA-90AB-376AD56F2253@khera.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support pgsql-general |
On Dec 8, 2007, at 9:21 AM, Geoffrey wrote:
> I am quite new to Slony as well, but one of the first requirements
> the docs state is:
>
> Thus, examples of cases where Slony-I probably won't work out well
> would include:
>
> * Sites where connectivity is really "flakey"
> * Replication to nodes that are unpredictably connected.
>
> So I suspect Slony is not a solution for your effort. See:
If your DB doesn't change very much (like a few hundred or thousand
update/insert/delete per day), then slony can work just fine in such a
batch mode. Things break down when you accumulate several hundred
thousand or more changes between times when you're connected.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-12-10 23:50:22 | Re: Fedora Core 8.0 status? |
Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2007-12-10 13:41:53 | Re: Unable to add server in PGadmin |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2007-12-10 15:46:21 | Re: Simpler dump? |
Previous Message | Douglas McNaught | 2007-12-10 15:44:39 | Re: Simpler dump? |