From: | Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Slony replication |
Date: | 2007-12-08 14:21:28 |
Message-ID: | 475AA868.7000607@serioustechnology.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support pgsql-general |
Pedro Doria Meunier wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to implement DB replication with Slony but with a slave
> that will not be always available.
> The master would have to check first of the slave's availability and
> then start syncing...
>
> Is this at all possible, or am I just raving? : )
I am quite new to Slony as well, but one of the first requirements the
docs state is:
Thus, examples of cases where Slony-I probably won't work out well
would include:
* Sites where connectivity is really "flakey"
* Replication to nodes that are unpredictably connected.
So I suspect Slony is not a solution for your effort. See:
http://slony.info/documentation/slonyintro.html#INTRODUCTION
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2007-12-08 17:13:52 | Re: [GENERAL] Slony replication |
Previous Message | Pedro Doria Meunier | 2007-12-08 09:51:21 | Slony replication |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John D. Burger | 2007-12-08 15:54:12 | Re: SQL design pattern for a delta trigger? |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-12-08 13:54:48 | Re: Returning columns from different tables, in plpgsql function |