| From: | Keaton Adams <kadams(at)mxlogic(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>, salman <salmanb(at)quietcaresystems(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB |
| Date: | 2008-03-25 20:28:35 |
| Message-ID: | C40EBC93.326F%kadams@mxlogic.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
But will that stand-by replication provide for a read-only slave?
On 3/25/08 2:26 PM, "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM, salman <salmanb(at)quietcaresystems(dot)com> wrote:
>> IIRC, it was mentioned previously in one posting that this a TODO for a
>> future version of postgres but not something that's expected soon.
>>
>> Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> This is what I saw on the TODO list:
> Write-Ahead Log
> * Allow WAL traffic to be streamed to another server for stand-by
> replication
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-03-25 20:28:47 | Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB |
| Previous Message | Keaton Adams | 2008-03-25 20:27:01 | Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-03-25 20:28:47 | Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB |
| Previous Message | Keaton Adams | 2008-03-25 20:27:01 | Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB |