Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB

From: "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: salman <salmanb(at)quietcaresystems(dot)com>
Cc: "Keaton Adams" <kadams(at)mxlogic(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB
Date: 2008-03-25 20:26:46
Message-ID: 396486430803251326n49368d88qad54656b42a6822b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:17 PM, salman <salmanb(at)quietcaresystems(dot)com> wrote:
> IIRC, it was mentioned previously in one posting that this a TODO for a
> future version of postgres but not something that's expected soon.
>
> Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

This is what I saw on the TODO list:
Write-Ahead Log
* Allow WAL traffic to be streamed to another server for stand-by replication

--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keaton Adams 2008-03-25 20:27:01 Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB
Previous Message Richard Broersma 2008-03-25 20:18:16 Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keaton Adams 2008-03-25 20:27:01 Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-25 20:26:45 advancing snapshot's xmin