| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |
| Date: | 2006-10-20 04:52:51 |
| Message-ID: | C15E14B3.17249%dpage@vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19/10/06 19:37, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:
> Why does adminpack install functions into pg_catalog? This is
> inconsistent with the rest of the contrib/ packages, not to mention the
> definition of pg_catalog itself (which ought to hold builtin object
> definitions).
The adminpack was originally written and intended to become builtin
functions, and in fact most of it has. pg_catalog was used to ensure
compatibility in the future, and because it's the only schema we can be sure
we'll find in any given database.
> And as AndrewSN pointed out on IRC, it also breaks
> pg_dump.
It does? In what way? I don't recall ever having any trouble restoring dumps
in the past.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | NikhilS | 2006-10-20 05:43:33 | Re: Asynchronous I/O Support |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-20 04:44:11 | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |