Re: adminpack and pg_catalog

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
Date: 2006-10-20 04:52:51
Message-ID: C15E14B3.17249%dpage@vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19/10/06 19:37, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:

> Why does adminpack install functions into pg_catalog? This is
> inconsistent with the rest of the contrib/ packages, not to mention the
> definition of pg_catalog itself (which ought to hold builtin object
> definitions).

The adminpack was originally written and intended to become builtin
functions, and in fact most of it has. pg_catalog was used to ensure
compatibility in the future, and because it's the only schema we can be sure
we'll find in any given database.

> And as AndrewSN pointed out on IRC, it also breaks
> pg_dump.

It does? In what way? I don't recall ever having any trouble restoring dumps
in the past.

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message NikhilS 2006-10-20 05:43:33 Re: Asynchronous I/O Support
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-20 04:44:11 Re: adminpack and pg_catalog