From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Subject: | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |
Date: | 2006-10-20 04:44:11 |
Message-ID: | 20061020044411.GS26892@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:37:34PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> Why does adminpack install functions into pg_catalog? This is
> inconsistent with the rest of the contrib/ packages, not to mention the
> definition of pg_catalog itself (which ought to hold builtin object
> definitions). And as AndrewSN pointed out on IRC, it also breaks
> pg_dump.
When we wrote newsysviews we faced the same dilema of where to put
things. We ultimately decided on a pg_ schema in the hope that no one
else would use that name (we also prefaced everything in the schema with
pg_, but a big reason for that was potential inclusion into core).
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-10-20 04:52:51 | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-20 03:52:27 | Re: Statements with syntax errors are not logged |