| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Gborg still down |
| Date: | 2006-04-22 08:01:48 |
| Message-ID: | C06FA17C.A779%dpage@vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 21/4/06 23:45, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:41:00PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> Most of the servers are not hosted by hub these days - we have them
>> pretty well distributed around the world these days.
>
> Well, wherever they're hosted monitoring has been an issue for as long
> as I can remember. Search not getting updated, list archives not
> updated, sites down, etc.
>
> If individuals hosting these various services aren't monitoring them
> adequately then the project itself should be monitoring them. Plus
> there's servers/services that I suspect won't get monitored very well by
> their owners (mirrors come to mind...)
As we already said, we do monitor them. However, we monitor that they are
running - ie. Do we get a response from Apache, ssh, rsyncd or whatever.
Checking whether the archives/search are serving up to date content would be
a whole other (difficult) problem altogether.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-04-22 12:44:51 | Re: [webmaster] PostgreSQLDirect .NET from Core Lab |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-04-22 07:20:18 | Re: techdocs beta testing |