Re: Gborg still down

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Gborg still down
Date: 2006-04-22 18:19:58
Message-ID: 20060422181958.GB96357@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 09:01:48AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> As we already said, we do monitor them. However, we monitor that they are
> running - ie. Do we get a response from Apache, ssh, rsyncd or whatever.
> Checking whether the archives/search are serving up to date content would be
> a whole other (difficult) problem altogether.

ISTM it wouldn't be that difficult if whatever updated the archives
stuffed the current time in a file somewhere once it was finished...

BTW, lest it sound like I don't appreciate the work of everyone who
keeps the various sites up, I do. But it hurts our credibility everytime
someone can't get to one of our sites, or the archives are out of date,
or search doesn't work, etc., etc. I know there's been some big
improvements made recently; I'm just hoping that we can get monitoring
setup for everything that's currently not being monitored.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-04-22 19:18:27 Re: Gborg still down
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-04-22 12:44:51 Re: [webmaster] PostgreSQLDirect .NET from Core Lab