From: | Michael Black <michaelblack75052(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | 9.1 Trigger question |
Date: | 2011-03-10 02:24:07 |
Message-ID: | BLU144-W3419E20F5D0171802CCAA6FAC80@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
The following from 9.1 documentation on triggers ----
"SQL allows you to define aliases for the "old"
and "new" rows or tables for use in the definition
of the triggered action (e.g., CREATE TRIGGER ... ON
tablename REFERENCING OLD ROW AS somename NEW ROW AS othername
...). Since PostgreSQL
allows trigger procedures to be written in any number of
user-defined languages, access to the data is handled in a
language-specific way.
"
This seems to imply that triggers actually have to reference a function
rather than containing the actual code for the trigger to perform. For
example the only valid format of a trigger is to
CREATE TRIGGER view_insert
--- other parameters here ---
EXECUTE PROCEDURE view_insert_row();
Instead of the normal way
CREATE TRIGGER view_insert
--- other parameters here ---
AS
--- sql functions, conditions and statements ---
;
Is my understand in of this correct? If so, how does the other language know the old record from the new?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sean Hsien | 2011-03-10 03:21:09 | 9.0 streaming replication problem |
Previous Message | hrsuprith | 2011-03-10 02:12:58 | Re: Detecting whether a point is in a box. |