Re: Toronto Postgres Users' Group (TPUG)

From: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>
Cc: Faisal Akber <fakber(at)vmware(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, brad nicholson <brad(dot)nicholson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jignesh Shah <jshah(at)vmware(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Toronto Postgres Users' Group (TPUG)
Date: 2013-11-16 18:06:36
Message-ID: BLU0-SMTP17118FCF789EDD29B558C52DCFA0@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:

here is already a mailing list left over from an attempt at a toronto pug
from years ago. http://www.postgresql.org/list/torontopug/

> Hi Faisal,
> Thank you for your quick reply.  I do plan on creating a Meetup account.  Once that's done, I'm
> guessing that the fine folks at the -www group can help add the Meetup links to the user-groups
> link.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>
> Or just paste the link on this thread - I will most likely be the one to add it to the site.
>
> Also, to your point of using T versus TOR for the short name of the group.  Here in Toronto, many
> of the groups like the Toronto Linux Users' Group (TLUG) and the Toronto Hadoop Users' Group
> (THUG) already follow this pattern.  This is the reason why I chose that as the short name.  I
> will think about your suggestion and talk to Steve and Brad to see what they think.  
>
>
> I was more curious in terms of the abbreviation - on the site it will go up as "Toronto PostgreSQL User Group"
> but if the abbreviation "TPUG" makes more sense based on how tech groups are named in Toronto, by all means go
> for it!
>
> Jonathan
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sameer Kumar 2013-11-18 02:03:52 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL User Group in Singapore
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2013-11-16 03:47:24 Re: Toronto Postgres Users' Group (TPUG)