From: | Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com> |
Cc: | Faisal Akber <fakber(at)vmware(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, brad nicholson <brad(dot)nicholson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jignesh Shah <jshah(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Toronto Postgres Users' Group (TPUG) |
Date: | 2013-11-16 18:06:36 |
Message-ID: | BLU0-SMTP17118FCF789EDD29B558C52DCFA0@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
here is already a mailing list left over from an attempt at a toronto pug
from years ago. http://www.postgresql.org/list/torontopug/
> Hi Faisal,
> Thank you for your quick reply. I do plan on creating a Meetup account. Once that's done, I'm
> guessing that the fine folks at the -www group can help add the Meetup links to the user-groups
> link. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>
> Or just paste the link on this thread - I will most likely be the one to add it to the site.
>
> Also, to your point of using T versus TOR for the short name of the group. Here in Toronto, many
> of the groups like the Toronto Linux Users' Group (TLUG) and the Toronto Hadoop Users' Group
> (THUG) already follow this pattern. This is the reason why I chose that as the short name. I
> will think about your suggestion and talk to Steve and Brad to see what they think.
>
>
> I was more curious in terms of the abbreviation - on the site it will go up as "Toronto PostgreSQL User Group"
> but if the abbreviation "TPUG" makes more sense based on how tech groups are named in Toronto, by all means go
> for it!
>
> Jonathan
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sameer Kumar | 2013-11-18 02:03:52 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL User Group in Singapore |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2013-11-16 03:47:24 | Re: Toronto Postgres Users' Group (TPUG) |