Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Date: 2021-09-25 10:07:43
Message-ID: BE0E0785-D0BD-472A-ADCF-46B30A48A30D@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 25 Sep 2021, at 12:03, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> As 9.6 will be EOL'd in a couple of weeks, is that really
> worth the effort though? It sounds risky to me to introduce an
> invasive change as that would increase the risk of bugs for existing
> users. So my vote would be to just let this one go.

Agreed, if it's not a simple fix it's unlikely to be worth it.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-09-25 11:42:42 Re: Timeout failure in 019_replslot_limit.pl
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2021-09-25 10:06:25 Re: row filtering for logical replication