| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility |
| Date: | 2021-09-25 13:45:29 |
| Message-ID: | 2501018.1632577529@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 25 Sep 2021, at 12:03, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> As 9.6 will be EOL'd in a couple of weeks, is that really
>> worth the effort though? It sounds risky to me to introduce an
>> invasive change as that would increase the risk of bugs for existing
>> users. So my vote would be to just let this one go.
> Agreed, if it's not a simple fix it's unlikely to be worth it.
Yeah, there will be no second chance to get 9.6.last right,
so I'd vote against touching it for this.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2021-09-25 13:55:29 | Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-09-25 12:09:10 | Re: pgcrypto support for bcrypt $2b$ hashes |