Re: Windows + IP6 progress

From: "Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows + IP6 progress
Date: 2005-08-18 23:11:31
Message-ID: BB05A27C22288540A3A3E8F3749B45AB01500A06@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The definition in WS2tcpip.h

WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE
int
WSAAPI
getaddrinfo(
IN const char FAR * nodename,
IN const char FAR * servname,
IN const struct addrinfo FAR * hints,
OUT struct addrinfo FAR * FAR * res
);

(IN, FAR, and OUT are #defined to empty string).

WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE is __declspec(dllimport)
WSAAPI is __stdcall

So, nothing magic with #defines of the name getaddrinfo.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 3:47 PM
> To: Andrew Dunstan
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows + IP6 progress
>
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > . what do we do about the getaddrinfo test? I'm almost inclined not
to
> > do it on windows, and assume that if we have ws2_32.dll we have it.
>
> There's something mighty fishy about that. AC_REPLACE_FUNCS works on
> Windows for the other cases it's used for (no?), so what's different
> about getaddrinfo? Perhaps Microsoft has #define'd that name as
> something else, or some equally ugly crock? It'd be useful to look
into
> their header files and see exactly how and where getaddrinfo is
> declared.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-18 23:18:15 Re: t_ctid chains
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-18 22:59:09 Re: Found: some pretty ugly VACUUM bugs