Re: Windows + IP6 progress

The mingw header has pretty much this with WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE IN OUT
and FAR dissolved away.

The standard test complains about it being an unresolved reference when
it is declared as "char getaddrinfo (); ". If we remove that and instead
include the header the test passes. I have no idea why that should be
the case for this function and not for others.

cheers

andrew

Chuck McDevitt wrote:

>The definition in WS2tcpip.h
>
>WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE
>int
>WSAAPI
>getaddrinfo(
> IN const char FAR * nodename,
> IN const char FAR * servname,
> IN const struct addrinfo FAR * hints,
> OUT struct addrinfo FAR * FAR * res
> );
>
>
>(IN, FAR, and OUT are #defined to empty string).
>
>WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE is __declspec(dllimport)
>WSAAPI is __stdcall
>
>So, nothing magic with #defines of the name getaddrinfo.
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
>>owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
>>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 3:47 PM
>>To: Andrew Dunstan
>>Cc: PostgreSQL-development
>>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows + IP6 progress
>>
>>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>
>>
>>>. what do we do about the getaddrinfo test? I'm almost inclined not
>>>
>>>
>to
>
>
>>>do it on windows, and assume that if we have ws2_32.dll we have it.
>>>
>>>
>>There's something mighty fishy about that. AC_REPLACE_FUNCS works on
>>Windows for the other cases it's used for (no?), so what's different
>>about getaddrinfo? Perhaps Microsoft has #define'd that name as
>>something else, or some equally ugly crock? It'd be useful to look
>>
>>
>into
>
>
>>their header files and see exactly how and where getaddrinfo is
>>declared.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>---------------------------(end of
>>
>>
>broadcast)---------------------------
>
>
>>TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>>
>>
>
>
>
>