| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |
| Date: | 2011-05-25 23:29:55 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinARksWwRF4tG5ex-+UaYCvep7x7g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On ons, 2011-04-27 at 18:14 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
>> Enthusiastic +1 for this concept. There's at least one rough edge: it fails if
>> you have another postmaster running on port 5432.
>
> This has now been addressed: pg_upgrade accepts PGPORT settings.
> Attached is a slightly updated patch runs the test suite with a port of
> 65432, which you can override by setting PGPORT yourself.
>
> Anyway, is this something that people want in the repository? It's not
> as polished as the pg_regress business, but it is definitely helpful.
Is this going to result in using the built binaries with the installed
libraries, a la Tom's recent complaint about the isolation tests?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2011-05-26 00:12:52 | Re: tackling full page writes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-25 23:11:31 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_class reltuples/relpages not updated by autovacuum/vacuum |