From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |
Date: | 2011-05-25 19:07:45 |
Message-ID: | 1306350465.5609.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2011-04-27 at 18:14 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> Enthusiastic +1 for this concept. There's at least one rough edge: it fails if
> you have another postmaster running on port 5432.
This has now been addressed: pg_upgrade accepts PGPORT settings.
Attached is a slightly updated patch runs the test suite with a port of
65432, which you can override by setting PGPORT yourself.
Anyway, is this something that people want in the repository? It's not
as polished as the pg_regress business, but it is definitely helpful.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgupgrade-check.patch | text/x-patch | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-25 19:13:44 | Re: use less space in xl_xact_commit patch |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-05-25 19:05:06 | Re: use less space in xl_xact_commit patch |