From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Please test peer (socket ident) auth on *BSD |
Date: | 2011-06-02 16:45:04 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTimfXDtpUOt1cSOT9NEPX4QWhf3aDw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of jue jun 02 11:59:02 -0400 2011:
>> On 06/02/2011 11:29 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
>> > As there was no going back now, I even touched msvc.pm.
>>
>> Why? Windows doesn't have Unix domain sockets at all.
>
> So much for being thorough :-P
Well, there is 2 approaches to portable C code:
1) You #ifdef the main code portable
2) You #ifdef common platform in headers, then main code
is written against common platform, without ifdefs.
I'm from the camp #2.
--
marko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2011-06-02 16:47:44 | Re: Please test peer (socket ident) auth on *BSD |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-02 16:44:02 | Re: Please test peer (socket ident) auth on *BSD |