From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Changing the sponsors page |
Date: | 2011-05-13 08:45:17 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=y41Yu7irbWCfGJh19Ak00Exr3sQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On May 13, 2011 9:58 AM, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:53, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:
> >> On 05/12/2011 02:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>> I think this scheme would be a lot simpler and easier to maintain, and
> >>> result in less arguing about what level someone should be.
> >>
> >> Except that nobody argues about it. The sponsorship team discusses and
just
> >> runs with it. Can you provide some evidence of blockage in terms of
getting
> >> people appropriate sponsorship levels?
> >
> > Despite asking more tha nonce, and getting confirmed more than once,
> > my company is still not listed under sponsors, even though they have
> > sponsored *many* hours of both development and sysadmin work for me
> > for over three years now.
>
> Out of interest, who did you ask? I don't remember it being me, but
> then you know what my memory is like.
Pretty sure I've mentioned it to you. But the "formal asking" was to at
least one, but I think both, the Josh:es.
/Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-05-13 13:05:02 | Re: Crediting sponsors in release notes? |
Previous Message | PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2011-05-13 08:20:37 | Re: Changing the sponsors page |