From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Changing the sponsors page |
Date: | 2011-05-13 07:58:05 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=HVX+YxN6qFtu6jjgg8R_TyY0e7w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:53, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 05/12/2011 02:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> I think this scheme would be a lot simpler and easier to maintain, and
>>> result in less arguing about what level someone should be.
>>
>> Except that nobody argues about it. The sponsorship team discusses and just
>> runs with it. Can you provide some evidence of blockage in terms of getting
>> people appropriate sponsorship levels?
>
> Despite asking more tha nonce, and getting confirmed more than once,
> my company is still not listed under sponsors, even though they have
> sponsored *many* hours of both development and sysadmin work for me
> for over three years now.
Out of interest, who did you ask? I don't remember it being me, but
then you know what my memory is like.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-05-13 08:02:06 | Re: Changing the sponsors page |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-05-13 06:52:20 | Re: Crediting sponsors in release notes? |