| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql's \h MOVE |
| Date: | 2011-04-04 00:37:39 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=i=OFvkj0t_JK+0qvFwMi5db5_Jw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
>> I just noticed that \h MOVE is particularly unhelpful:
>> alvherre=# \h move
>> Command: MOVE
>> Description: position a cursor
>> Syntax:
>> MOVE [ direction { FROM | IN } ] cursorname
>
>> The problem is that it doesn't specify what "direction" is. The doc
>> text tells you to look into FETCH for details, but in \h you have to
>> guess.
>
>> We could fix this by including a note about fetch in the <synopsis>,
>> so that it'd look like this:
>
>> alvherre=# \h move
>> Command: MOVE
>> Description: position a cursor
>> Syntax:
>> MOVE [ direction [ FROM | IN ] ] cursor_name
>
>> See FETCH for details on direction
>
> -1 ... if this annoys you, just duplicate the definition of direction
> from FETCH.
+1 for duplicating the definition.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-04 00:38:55 | Re: Migration page is out of date |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-03 23:51:46 | Re: found a very confusing and maybe outdated sentence |