| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql's \h MOVE |
| Date: | 2011-04-02 16:53:08 |
| Message-ID: | 26889.1301763188@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> I just noticed that \h MOVE is particularly unhelpful:
> alvherre=# \h move
> Command: MOVE
> Description: position a cursor
> Syntax:
> MOVE [ direction { FROM | IN } ] cursorname
> The problem is that it doesn't specify what "direction" is. The doc
> text tells you to look into FETCH for details, but in \h you have to
> guess.
> We could fix this by including a note about fetch in the <synopsis>,
> so that it'd look like this:
> alvherre=# \h move
> Command: MOVE
> Description: position a cursor
> Syntax:
> MOVE [ direction [ FROM | IN ] ] cursor_name
> See FETCH for details on direction
-1 ... if this annoys you, just duplicate the definition of direction
from FETCH.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-03 23:51:46 | Re: found a very confusing and maybe outdated sentence |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-04-02 14:09:49 | Re: fixed doc bug in sepgsql.sgml |