From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Branch 1.14? |
Date: | 2011-06-14 14:25:32 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTi=JNkMGn=0BrFUv85JPPj-7+EojrQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > PostgreSQL already created a 9.1 branch, so that new features could be
>> > commited on head. Actually, there'll be a commitfest starting tomorrow.
>> > Should we also create a new branch, so that new features could be
>> > applied on head?
>> >
>> > I have no features right now to commit and push, but it could be
>> > interesting nevertheless.
>>
>> If there's nothing to commit, then all it means it that we'll have to
>> start double-patching bugfixes for no gain.
>>
>
> OK, so we open it as soon as we have a commit to push?
Yes.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-06-14 18:50:10 | Re: Branch 1.14? |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-06-14 13:59:58 | Re: Branch 1.14? |