From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Branch 1.14? |
Date: | 2011-06-14 18:50:10 |
Message-ID: | 1308077410.2008.0.camel@laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> >> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > PostgreSQL already created a 9.1 branch, so that new features could be
> >> > commited on head. Actually, there'll be a commitfest starting tomorrow.
> >> > Should we also create a new branch, so that new features could be
> >> > applied on head?
> >> >
> >> > I have no features right now to commit and push, but it could be
> >> > interesting nevertheless.
> >>
> >> If there's nothing to commit, then all it means it that we'll have to
> >> start double-patching bugfixes for no gain.
> >>
> >
> > OK, so we open it as soon as we have a commit to push?
>
> Yes.
>
Seems good to me. I don't expect to have new features soon anyway,
except the Luis's project.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasmin Dizdarevic | 2011-06-14 18:57:15 | Re: Branch 1.14? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-06-14 14:25:32 | Re: Branch 1.14? |