Re: Bi-Directional replication client awareness

From: Martin Gudmundsson <martingudmundsson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bi-Directional replication client awareness
Date: 2014-07-13 19:54:54
Message-ID: AE0E3717-C766-40A9-82DA-5333CEF6C06F@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> I think we (as in postgres) will probably get the ability to run
> individual transactions in such a mode, but you surely wouldn't want to
> run every transaction in it.
>

So, would then these transactions be ”2-phase”?

I mean either all nodes commit the transaction or none of them do?
Or only to those in the synchronous_standby_names?

Perhaps to early to say?

Been playing around with BDR all weekend, really interesting.

> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Gudmundsson 2014-07-13 20:34:32 Re: Bi-Directional replication client awareness
Previous Message Ru Devel 2014-07-13 19:07:48 Why corruption memory in one database affects all the cluster?