| From: | Martin Gudmundsson <martingudmundsson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bi-Directional replication client awareness |
| Date: | 2014-07-13 20:34:32 |
| Message-ID: | 0DBE3D6D-B1E7-4CF3-8ABE-21B00AF555D9@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
13 jul 2014 kl. 21:54 skrev Martin Gudmundsson <martingudmundsson(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> I think we (as in postgres) will probably get the ability to run
>> individual transactions in such a mode, but you surely wouldn't want to
>> run every transaction in it.
>>
>
> So, would then these transactions be ”2-phase”?
Sorry, should be 2-safe, not 2-phase
>
> I mean either all nodes commit the transaction or none of them do?
> Or only to those in the synchronous_standby_names?
>
> Perhaps to early to say?
>
> Been playing around with BDR all weekend, really interesting.
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Andres Freund
>>
>> --
>> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
>> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Gudmundsson | 2014-07-13 21:10:15 | BDR: Strange values in pg_stat_replication |
| Previous Message | Martin Gudmundsson | 2014-07-13 19:54:54 | Re: Bi-Directional replication client awareness |