| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SR slaves and .pgpass |
| Date: | 2010-06-09 05:24:57 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinm05jTPQHSgixYGFNeA9vf4u0OtlJu1laD37fZ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way
> "localhost" is used.
OK. The attached patch allows us to use "replication" in the database
field of the .pgpass file, for the replication connection.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pgpass_v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-06-09 06:01:13 | Re: [PATCH] Fix leaky VIEWs for RLS |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-06-09 03:52:55 | Re: SR slaves and .pgpass |